We’re back from the Olympic Break and most teams have no more than six games left in the regular season. Yet the numbers still continue to fluctuate, especially with teams affected by injuries, deals and more. Let’s take a look.
How do things stand in terms of point differential? Here are the standings using expected full-season wins based on differential.
Team ExpW Team ExpW------------------ ------------------San Antonio 20.1 Connecticut 23.2Seattle 19.9 Detroit 20.4Minnesota 19.7 New York 18.2Los Angeles 18.7 Indiana 17.2Sacramento 16.7 Chicago 16.0Houston 16.3 Washington 11.2Phoenix 15.9 Atlanta 4.6
The Lynx improved their differential in their first game back from the break. If they maintained it and missed the playoffs, only the 2003 Storm and 1998 New York Liberty would have better differentials amongst lottery-bound team. By the way, Phoenix’s record overstates how much the Mercury has struggled this year.
In the East, Chicago is creeping up on Indiana for the last playoff spot. Surprisingly, the Sky’s differential has yet to improve much since the break; it was already much better than Chicago’s record.
Alright, to the leaders in Offensive and Defensive Rating on a per-possession basis.
Team ORating Team DRating--------------------- ---------------------Phoenix 106.2 Indiana 92.6Minnesota 103.7 San Antonio 93.8Connecticut 103.4 Seattle 94.6Detroit 102.0 Los Angeles 94.7New York 100.3 Connecticut 96.8Seattle 99.3 Houston 97.5AVERAGE 98.5 Detroit 97.7Chicago 98.1 Sacramento 98.0San Antonio 98.1 AVERAGE 98.5Sacramento 97.5 Chicago 98.7Los Angeles 97.5 New York 98.9Houston 95.3 Washington 99.9Indiana 93.1 Minnesota 100.0Atlanta 92.5 Atlanta 106.8Washington 91.7 Phoenix 108.0
Not a lot of major movement. On the strength of Saturday’s defensive slugfest in Los Angeles, the Silver Stars moved up into second place in the league in Defensive Rating ahead of the Storm. Chicago’s post-break improvement has come on the defensive end thanks to Sylvia Fowles’ shot-blocking presence in the paint.
With MVP voting underway at WNBA.com, I’m going to focus on the numbers in the MVP race the rest of the season. Here’s a look at the two stats I lend the most credence: Wins Above Replacement Player by my rating system and Net Plus-Minus rating, as tracked by Paul Swanson of the Lynx. I’ve included the top 10 by WARP as well as a few other players that deserve to be part of the discussion in no small part because of their excellent net plus-minus ratings. Their WARP rank is in parentheses.
Player Tm WARP Net +/- Rk------------------------------------------Candace Parker LAS 8.2 +12.6 5Diana Taurasi PHO 7.3 + 8.8 18Lindsay Whalen CON 7.0 + 0.4 65Lisa Leslie LAS 6.5 + 4.2 44Sophia Young SAS 6.3 +15.8 2Lauren Jackson SEA 5.6 +12.8 4Candice Dupree CHI 5.5 + 8.3 20Jia Perkins CHI 5.4 +10.0 12Becky Hammon SAS 5.4 + 3.6 48Candice Wiggins MIN 5.1 + 9.1 17
Player Tm WARP Net +/- Rk------------------------------------------Asjha Jones (11) CON 4.9 +10.2 11S. Augustus (16) MIN 4.1 +15.5 3Sue Bird (22) SEA 3.4 +20.3 1
Some thoughts:


E-mail feedback
RSS Feed